Do not say I, but Heikki Kovalainen in his Twitter account. In fact it is a phrase that said yesterday and opens a debate (agreement, only for me) on the rules of the current F1, racing, the excitement... Many aspects condensed into a single sentence addition, seen from his perspective, are certain.
Much has commented on the new rules of the F1 - I agree with that are a great success, the races are unpredictable and there are more overtaking, so workThe truth is that we can be sure that 2010 was more exciting than 2009, and 2011 is being more exciting if it were possible that last season. After the first three races of the year we can make a positive, even with all that remains it to improve and refine this regulation.
The short answer is that Yes, that I have seen but always and when the system works well. Examples that faster comes to mind are those of the rear spoiler which is not opened for Alonso in Malaysia, or which opens where not to Barrichello in Australia and the own Alonso in China.
There was also a small mistake by the Commissioners in China allowing the use of the DRS very late, when the cars were quite close to the terminal velocities. But that didn't prevent see beautiful overtaking, and Yes, enabled by a device. AND? There are still to come to the pilot that we intend to move forward.
In addition the use of the KERS is more widespread for almost everyone, they are more reliable, pilots know get more party and, ultimately, I think that now that aid, although in my opinion help unless the DRS. And in situations as in China, the use of the KERS out of the 13 curve makes that is reached before the terminal velocity and that the DRS works even worse.
Known with Heikki Kovalainen. And precisely Kovalainen benefited dramatically new rules, and if not did not explain the tremendous post 16 in China, ahead of Sergio Perez and Pastor Maldonado, the two Virgin, the other Lotus-Renault, the two HRT...
